This is a great essay about judicail restraint vs. judicail activism with footnotes in chicago style.

The Reasons for Judicial Restraint Judicial review is the power given to Supreme Court justices in which a judge has the power to reason whether a law is deemed unconstitutional according to the constitution. Chief justice John Marshall initiated the Supreme Court's right to translate the constitution in the famous case, which took place in 1803 Marbury Vs. Madison; moreover, he declared that the Supreme Court was the sole interpreters of Constitutional law. This happens to …

…Law, second edition ( Biddles Ltd, King's Lynn, Norfolk: Oxford University press, 1994) , 36. Justice Anthony Scalia , Dissent , LAWRENCE and GARNER PETITIONERS vs. TEXAS June 26, 2003 Justice Hugo Black, Dissent, U.S. Supreme Court GRISWOLD V. CONNECTICUT, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) James Madison, The Federalist papers: Letter No 10 (New York: Mentor, 1961), 48 William H. Rehnquist, "The notion of a living constitution" in John Arthur and William Shaw, Readings in the Philosophy of law, fourth edition (upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson prentice Hall, 2006), 543.