INTRODUCTION - THE OBJECTIVE OF FAIRNESS On the 31st of March 2001, Attorney-General, Daryl Williams, launched the National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council's (NADRAC) discussion paper on ‘The Development of Standards for Alternative Dispute Resolution’. Among the ‘core objectives for ADR’ highlighted by NADRAC in this document was that ADR “uses a process which is considered by the parties to be fair.” This ‘objective of fairness’ is reflected in NADRAC’s 1997 paper entitled ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution …showed first 75 words of 3154 total…

…showed last 75 words of 3154 total…Society Journal (NSW), Volume 34(6), July 1996, p50. Sauve M, “Mediation: Towards and Aboriginal Conceptualisation” Aboriginal Law Bulletin, Volume 3(80), May 1996, p10. Singer L, Settling Disputes: Conflict Resolution in Business, Families, and the Legal System, Westview Press, Oxford,1994. Vann V, “Confidentiality in court sponsored mediation: disclose at your own risk?” Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, Volume 10(3), August 1999, p195. Watts G “Can clients who go to a Family Court conciliation conference speak freely?” Law Society Journal(NSW), Volume 34(5), June 199 6, p21.