James Ahiakpor in his essay, “WICKSELL ON THE CLASSICAL THEORIES OF MONEY, CREDIT, INTEREST AND THE PRICE LEVEL: PROGRESS OR RETROGRESSION?” started up the argument which was followed by the number of replies. His treatment of Wicksell place in the history of monetary economics is kind of biased, as we shall see further. As he states in the Abstract to his essay: Knut Wicksell occupies a significant place in the history of monetary economics as …showed first 75 words of 1958 total…

…showed last 75 words of 1958 total…CREDIT, INTEREST AND PRICE LEVEL: A COMMENT ON AHIAKPOR,” American Journal of Economics & Sociology 58 (Jul 1999) Ekelund, Robert B. Jr., Hébert, Robert F., “A History of Economic Theory and Method,” 4th ed, (The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1997) Gootzeit, Michael J., “WICKSELL VS THE CLASSICS ON THE MECHANICS OF THE QUANTITY THEORY: A COMMENT ON AHIAKPOR,” American Journal of Economics & Sociology 58 (Jul 1999) Humphrey, Thomas M., “EXONERATING WICKSELL: A COMMENT ON AHIAKPOR,” American Journal of Economics & Sociology 58 (Jul 1999)