Clash Of The Titans: Kierkegaard Vs. Nietzsche On Theories Of Knowledge
Title: Clash Of The Titans: Kierkegaard Vs. Nietzsche On Theories Of Knowledge
Category: /Social Sciences/Philosophy
Details: Words: 3011 | Pages: 11 (approximately 235 words/page)
Clash Of The Titans: Kierkegaard Vs. Nietzsche On Theories Of Knowledge
Category: /Social Sciences/Philosophy
Details: Words: 3011 | Pages: 11 (approximately 235 words/page)
Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche are considered by most to be the grandfathers of existentialist thought. While they had many ideas in common, such as the errors of all previous philosophers, they differed on thoughts concerning knowledge. Kierkegaard believed that knowledge could only be communicated to the audience indirectly, and through that the individual must make his own choice as to which possibility he will accept and make his own subjective truth. Nietzsche, on
showed first 75 words of 3011 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 3011 total
Not only that, but Nietzsche also validates his own theory by showing how his will to power has been exercised by his dominance over Kierkegaard. It is clear after reading both works who's will to power was stronger.
Works Cited
Kierkegaard, Søren. "Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments". Kierkegaard And Nietzsche. Ed. Marina Vitkin. Toronto: Print City, 2003.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. "Beyond Good And Evil". Trans. Walter Kaufmann. Basic Writings Of Nietzsche. New York: Random House, 1967.

