In a critical response to, “Next, Comprehensive Reform of Gun Laws” written by USA today, I feel that the author writes with a great deal of rhetoric and unsupported claims throughout the entire article. At the very beginning of the writing, USA Today bashes gun lobbyists by using a persuasive explanation to describe the passing of the Brady Bill. “The gun lobby got sucker-punched… It couldn’t have happened to a more deserving bunch”, claims …showed first 75 words of 767 total…

…showed last 75 words of 767 total…article, USA Today sneaks one more plea for support stating, “These new laws are just a start”. Throughout the entire article, USA Today uses slanders and diverse Pseudoreasoning tactics to sway the reader’s attention the topic. Almost as a smokescreen, the author bashes gun lobbyists, and then the government, but continues to ask for more attention and help on the subject of gun control, leaving the reader lost in a sea of unsupported claims.